The decks that get funded answer five questions in the first four minutes.

A partner spends under four minutes on your deck, looking for five specific things in a specific order. We hold the rubric a fund actually scores against — we use it to score applications today, and we run your deck through the same criteria, slide by slide, and show you exactly where it loses them.

Get my deck scored → Plans start at $10. Five questions to start — no card today.

It's rarely the business. It's almost always the deck.

The same handful of gaps show up over and over, in decks behind businesses that are genuinely fundable. Here's what a partner actually sees.

The traction slide shows activity, not evidence.

The market slide is top-down, and the partner stopped believing it at "$X billion TAM."

There's no slide answering "why you."

The ask has no use of funds.

Not "make it compelling." The exact gap, and the fix.

A sample of what your analysis looks like — every slide, scored against the same dimensions a fund scores your written application against.

Sample analysis · not a real founder's deck
Readiness: Needs work2 of 5 rubric dimensions ready to send
Scored against
Core product · Customer · Business model · Stage signals · Founder pattern
Slide 4 — Traction
Rubric asks
Under Stage signals — evidence the business is past pure idea stage: usage that sticks, revenue, or committed customers.
Your slide
Shows signups and app opens over six months.
The gap
Signups and opens are activity, not evidence — no retention, no revenue, no customer named.
Rewrite: replace the activity chart with three numbers that prove pull — week-4 retention, revenue or signed LOIs, and your biggest customer's name.
Slide 6 — Market
Rubric asks
Under Customer — a market sized from the customer up: how many of them exist, what they pay, how you reach them.
Your slide
Opens with "$4.2B TAM" from a market report.
The gap
A partner stops reading top-down TAM slides at the first billion — it says nothing about who buys and why.
Rewrite: lead with your actual first 100 customers and what they pay, then build the market up from there.
Slide 9 — Why You
Rubric asks
Under Founder pattern — the specific, unfair reason this team wins this market.
Your slide
Lists founder bios and past employers.
The gap
No slide states why this team, specifically, solves this problem.
Rewrite: one line per founder tying their background directly to an unfair advantage in this exact market.
Slide 11 — The Ask
Rubric asks
Under Business model — an amount tied to milestones, with use of funds that shows what the raise buys.
Your slide
States "Raising $500K."
The gap
No use of funds, no milestones — a partner can't tell what $500K buys.
Rewrite: break the raise into three or four line items, each tied to the milestone it unlocks.

Your real analysis covers every slide in your deck, not just four.

Two ways to use the notes. Both are fine.

Fix it in our editor

Slide-level AI editing, chart rebuilding, and PDF export — go from the gap we found straight into the fix, in the same workspace.

Or take the notes anywhere

The analysis is yours. Fix it in Google Slides, Keynote, or with a designer — no lock-in, no penalty for leaving.

Don't have a deck yet? Generate one first →

The rubric your deck is scored against is the same one we use to score written funding applications today — real investment-archetype criteria, not a generic checklist. Every analysis is reviewed by a person, not just a model — the same standard behind Funding Concierge's deck feedback "from someone who has raised before."

Unlimited reads. Nine writes. Here's why.

Analysis is cheap to give you as much of as you need. Editing is craft — a person doing real work on your slides — so it's capped at a number we can actually deliver well.

Unlimited analysis, 2 months

Re-run the scoring as many times as you revise. No cap on reads.

Up to 9 edits

Nine rounds of slide-level edits in the workspace, applied by a person.

Applied to every application

The same fixed deck attaches to every application you submit through us. See open funds →

This is our top package — unlimited analysis and edits for a fixed price over two months. Prefer to start smaller? Compare all packages →

Your deck is the only thing standing between this business and a yes.

Find out exactly where it loses a partner, before the next fund tells you "not a fit right now."

Get my deck scored → View full pricing packages →